Dissecting AI

All papers

Generative Representation Learning for Scalable Latent Tokenization

Alan Baade, Kyle Sargent, Vincent Sitzmann, Eric Ryan Chan, Justin Johnson, Li Fei-Fei et al.

arXiv 2610.20533 22 pages Read the paper

The short version

The problem
Image generators often first turn an image into a set of compact features, or tokens. Features trained to recognize what matters for one task can throw away other details, making it harder for a generator to recreate the full image—and training a separate tokenizer is only worthwhile if it saves compute overall.
The idea
RePR teaches image-patch features to record how much one visible part helps predict another. It estimates that help by comparing a generative model’s predictions with and without the extra context, then trains the features to reproduce the difference. For example, if seeing one region makes a neighboring patch easier to predict, their features should reflect that shared information; the method also builds up estimates from smaller prediction steps and can emphasize information that survives stronger corruption.
What it got
RePR’s image-generation system achieved a Fréchet Inception Distance (FID, a measure of generated-image quality where lower is better) of 2.18 on ImageNet, compared with 2.36 for direct pixel generation at roughly equal training compute. Its results also show that the learned representations improve predictably as training compute increases.

Modules from this paper

Generative Prediction Differences

Contrastive learning needs negative examples to estimate how two views relate; RePR uses changes in conditional generative likelihood to estimate their shared information and trains feature dot products to match it.

representation-learningmutual-informationgenerative-modelsRePR

Incremental Prediction for Tractable Information Estimation

Estimating shared information for a large target can be intractable; RePR replaces the whole-target estimate with successive likelihood-ratio increments that telescope to the full estimate.

representation learningmutual informationgenerative modelingdiffusion

Iterative Feature Prediction

Pixel targets can limit representation learning; RePR repeats training with patch features from an earlier model as prediction targets.

representation-learningself-supervisionRePRfeature-prediction

Spatially Equivariant Patch Representations

Unsupervised intermediate patch tokens can become unstable; directly supervising each patch feature while withholding absolute position and querying by center-relative offsets encourages spatially structured representations.

representation-learningvisionequivariancetokenization