Generative Prediction Differences
Contrastive learning needs negative examples to estimate how two views relate; RePR uses changes in conditional generative likelihood to estimate their shared information and trains feature dot products to match it.
Alan Baade, Kyle Sargent, Vincent Sitzmann, Eric Ryan Chan, Justin Johnson, Li Fei-Fei et al.
arXiv 2610.20533 22 pages Read the paper
Contrastive learning needs negative examples to estimate how two views relate; RePR uses changes in conditional generative likelihood to estimate their shared information and trains feature dot products to match it.
Estimating shared information for a large target can be intractable; RePR replaces the whole-target estimate with successive likelihood-ratio increments that telescope to the full estimate.
Pixel targets can limit representation learning; RePR repeats training with patch features from an earlier model as prediction targets.
Unsupervised intermediate patch tokens can become unstable; directly supervising each patch feature while withholding absolute position and querying by center-relative offsets encourages spatially structured representations.